Exploring how leadership ambiguity shapes the evolving employee-employer dynamic and influences human-centered employee experiences

Njabulo Mashigo

People Strategist & Culture Evangelist at Vodacom

City of Johannesburg, South Africa

The complexities of organisational leadership have never been greater. Employees now exercise significant agency in their career choices—a trend that has become increasingly evident in the post-COVID landscape. This environment calls for organisations to re-examine the employment relationship to create mutually beneficial outcomes. Leaders are encouraged to collaborate with their teams to shape the employee experience. Decision-making is no longer solely at the discretion of management; the focus is shifting from work arrangements (remote, hybrid, or full-time) towards fostering connection and a sense of purpose. Employees are seeking genuine opportunities for impact and meaningful engagement. Consequently, several key questions arise upon this reflection.

Leadership Ambiguity:

How does uncertainty in leadership roles and direction affect employee engagement, trust, and motivation?

Evolving Employee-Employer Dynamics: What new expectations and responsibilities are emerging in the modern workplace, and how do these shifts impact the ways organisations support and empower their people?

Human-Centered Employee Experiences: In what ways can organisations design experiences that prioritise employee wellbeing, growth, and purpose in an era of constant change?

When leadership roles, decision rights, and strategic direction are unclear, employees expend energy trying to interpret “what matters” rather than focusing on meaningful work. This ambiguity often shows up as inconsistent messaging, shifting priorities, and unclear accountability—which can quickly erode trust. People start to question whether leaders are competent, aligned, or acting in good faith, especially when decisions feel reactive or unexplained.

Over time, ambiguity also reduces engagement because it weakens the psychological conditions employees need to commit: clarity of purpose, confidence in priorities, and a sense that their contributions connect to the bigger picture. In uncertain environments, employees may disengage to protect themselves—doing only what is required, avoiding initiative, and hesitating to speak up. Instead of co-creating solutions, they wait for direction, because taking ownership feels risky when expectations might change without warning.

Finally, leadership ambiguity directly impacts motivation. Intrinsic motivation thrives when people experience autonomy, competence, and progress; ambiguity interrupts all three.

The directive for leadership is unambiguous, though challenging: businesses must be reimagined to prioritise human-centric practices. Numerous viewpoints exist regarding how to achieve this goal; one particularly compelling approach draws upon Carol Sandford’s work on “Regenerative Businesses,” which asserts that organisations are living systems rather than mechanical entities. It is essential for organisations to align their development with the progression of human consciousness, which is advancing more rapidly than organisational transformation. Individuals possess the capacity for growth beyond what is often recognised by their employers or organisations.

Modern workplaces increasingly depend on leaders who appreciate employees’ real-life (lived) experiences—not to simply fix problems, but to foster empathy and collaborate in creating practices that support a positive work environment. Employees play an equally vital role; they are stewards of their own skills, careers, and growth. Carol’s model of human potential highlights three fundamental qualities—locus of control, scope of consideration, and source of agency—that exist in everyone. Yet, many contemporary job roles, like repetitive office or factory work, rarely offer chances to cultivate these traits. In such settings, workers often adhere to strict routines and instructions, which limits their ability to exercise personal control, expand their viewpoints, or act autonomously. Consequently, opportunities for growth, innovation, and true engagement are diminished, making it harder for individuals to realize their full potential.

Considering this context, an examination of people practices within diverse organisations indicates that organisational design and architecture warrant reconsideration. While job descriptions serve a valuable purpose, they may inadvertently limit initiative and encourage task-oriented thinking over innovation. Competencies used for aptitude assessment can frequently be developed through training. Fostering innovation requires an environment where mistakes are accepted as part of the process. Reducing excessive control over labour is essential to positively influence desired behaviours. Eliminating incentives that reward narrow pursuits enables teams to shift their focus from self-promotion and individual gain towards prioritising customer needs.

The role of HR is pivotal in raising awareness of these concepts and, more importantly, in reshaping organisational culture and employee experience touchpoints to redefine employee contributions—shifting from traditional job descriptions to networks of ideas. HR is responsible for designing empowered, agile teams and eliminating environmental pitfalls that reduce employees to mere commodities. Interconnectedness and flexibility emerge as essential principles for organisational development. Furthermore, this approach to hyper-personalisation in the employee experience encompasses all stages of the employee life cycle and promotes greater experimentation in leadership development and capability building for the future.

To sum up, organisations’ emphasis on Purpose has encouraged a shift towards broader goals beyond individual interests. However, it’s essential that this focus is genuine and supports both personal development and shared value within the organisation. The concepts of awareness and allyship are now central to modern leadership and shaping employee experience. Today’s leaders don’t need all the answers; instead, they’re expected to engage openly with the diverse experiences of those in their workplace. By understanding power dynamics, leaders can make better decisions with greater influence. Ultimately, many factors shape an organisation’s performance culture, and leaders must consistently help team members understand how their daily efforts contribute to overall strategy.

Subscribe our newsletter

Sign up our newsletter to get update information, news and free insight.